|
Sunlight Availability is a measure of the average number of hours of
sunlight one would expect to receive at a given position, as a fraction
of the unobstructed total number of hours at the same location. The BRE
have compiled data sets consisting of a statistical sample of solar positions
convolved with local meteorological data. Using these to calculate Sunlight
Availability, one would simply calculate the number of solar positions
visible from a point, compared to the total number, expressed as a percentage.
The diagram below, taken from the BRE report, shows the solar positions,
relative to a reference point, used to calculate Sunlight Availability
for London (51.5° N).
|
| |
|

|
| |
|
BRE Criterion
The BRE report states that for windows within a new development, if
a point at the centre of a window on the plane of the inside surface of
the wall "... can receive more than one quarter of annual probable
sunlight hours, including at least 5% of annual probable hours during
the winter months between 21 st September and 21 st March, then the room
should still receive enough sunlight." For windows in surrounding
properties which experience a change in sulight availability, it goes
on to say that, "Any reduction in sunlight access below this level
should be kept to a minimum. If the available sunlight hours are both
less than the amount given and less than 0.8 times their former value,
either over the whole year or just during the winter months, then the
occupants will notice the loss of sunlight."
|
| |
| Sunlight availability indicator example |
 |
| |
|
Sunlight availability can also be represented on a Waldram diagram.
The two Waldram Diagrams on the right depict the sun positions for
an example situation. The existing building is in green, the proposed
development is shown in red.
| Existing |
Proposed |
|
| Summer |
Winter |
Total |
Summer |
Winter |
Total |
Loss % |
|
24
|
2
|
26
|
11
|
1
|
12
|
54
|
This table shows the results obtained from the two sun position
calculations.The existing situation does not meet the BRE levels
to be considered adequateley sunlit but it is close, only failing
because it receives 2 out of 5 required winter suns. The proposed
situation is well below the required levels and also produces a
loss of over half the total 'suns' when compared to the existing
building.
Looking at the Waldrams again it is obvious that none of the suns
are visible above either the existing or proposed buildings. The
loss of available sunlight is not due to the height of the proposed
development but to the size of the its footprint.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Subjective Assessment
It is often useful to visualise solar paths as viewed from a particular
position. The example on the right shows solar paths plotted onto
a Waldram Diagram. This provides a snapshot of times and dates showing
when a window will receive direct sunlight. It also shows which
part of a building is responsible for causing a shadow. Another
method of subjective assessment involves producing shadow
animations. to compare the existing and proposed scenarios.
|
|
|
|